Ett Mexiko-baserat upprop mot skövlingen av Amazonas. Hämtat från den socialistiska tidningen Socialist Action.
--------------------------------------------------------
STATEMENT FROM MEXICO
“I don’t want flowers at my funeral, because I know they will be taken from the forest.” — Chico Mendes
The defense of the Amazon is a fight for the future of the earth.
Although the destruction of the Amazon rainforest was already an
alarming issue for decades, with the acceleration of this process due to
the negligence of the government of the extreme rightist Jair
Bolsonaro, but above all to its direct complicity with agribusiness,
livestock and mining companies, it becomes even more urgent is that our
species takes decisive measures to stop the catastrophe. In turn, this
highlights the organic link between environmental devastation and the
prevailing political and economic relations: the fate of our planet and
our civilization should not be left to a system that promotes private
gain at the expense of the common good.
It is imperative to understand that, although the deforestation of
the Amazon most directly affects the peoples of the nine countries that
host it, especially the indigenous peoples who form part of the forest,
its degradation and destruction has regional and global impacts. It
contains about 20% of the planet’s fresh water, is one of the most
bio-diverse eco-regions and constitutes one of the most important carbon
stores in the world, so the loss of this ecosystem not only deprives
humanity of multiple material and intangible contributions to its
well-being, but also alters the planetary living conditions under which
both our species and those on which we depend have evolved.
Of particular concern is the immediate impact that the release of
tons of greenhouse gases, produced by the combustion of the forest
biomass, will have on global warming, especially when, according to the
estimates of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, we are in
the limitation period to carry out the necessary civilizational
transformations to strengthen some possibility that planetary change
does not impede our life as we know it. Bolsonaro, in the manner of a
disastrous Brazilian Donald Trump, denies scientific evidence and, along
with his racist, misogynist, anti-secular, anti-worker and anti-sexual
diversity policies, erodes environmental regulations for the benefit of
extractive companies , which is why articulating a broad political
opposition to his regime and its international supporters is key to the
future of the Amazon rainforest and humanity.
We who subscribe to this statement, call for internationalist
solidarity with the indigenous communities of the Amazon, especially
with the thousands of women who marched in Brasilia to defend it; with
the agro-ecological movements, with the scientific community that
resists reactionary obscurantism, with the workers of the countryside
and the city who oppose the resurgence of neoliberalism, with the
students who take to the streets and, in general, with all sectors
inside and outside Brazil that fight for the jungle and for humanity. It
is important that, at the same time, we put pressure on governments and
the United Nations Organization itself to take actions to stop and
mitigate fires, while identifying and ceasing the promotion of companies
and sectors directly benefiting from the destruction of the Amazon
jungle.
As for Mexico, which, like Brazil, is part of the group of
mega-diverse countries, threats to biocultural wealth through government
policy are also a challenge. As part of a global contest for the
future, it is up to us to question, challenge and oppose in an organized
manner the Tren Maya, Corredor Ferroviario Transístmico, “Sembrando
Vida” and the Proyecto Integral Morelos which, together with the Special
Economic Zones and agricultural projects, roads, tourism, energy, port
and mining still in progress, maintain the neo-liberal and extractivist
orientation that benefits a minority at the expense of the welfare of
ecosystems, communities and the working population. In Mexico, we also
fight for the Earth contesting the present and seeking to have a
dignified future, without exploitation, misery or extermination: Our
struggle is for life!
Signatory organisations :
Ciencia para el Pueblo
Carnaval del Maíz
Haciendo Milpa A.C.
Red Universitaria Anticapitalista (RUA)
Sindicato Mexicano de Electricistas (SME)
Nueva Central de Trabajadores (NCT)
Colectivo de Jóvenes de la Nueva Central de Trabajadores
Organización Política del Pueblo y los Trabajadores (OPT)
Partido Revolucionario de las y los Trabajadores (PRT)
Agrupación de Lucha Socialista (ALS)
Red Humedales de Colima
La Otra Ciencia
Pro Pedregal – Ciencias
AxM Colectivo
Colectivo Transdisciplinario de Investigaciones Críticas (COTRIC)
Colectiva Feminista Socialista Voces de Lilith
Pacto Morelos por la Soberanía Alimentaria y Energética y los Derechos de las y los Trabajadores
Comisión Independiente de Derechos Humanos de Morelos A. C. Rebelión
Espacio Estudiantil 2 de Octubre
Revive México A.C.
Colectivo ¿Qué hacer aquí con esto?”
Brigada Animal México
The Save Movement
Climate Save Movement
Centro Integral de Comunicación Comunitaria
Cooperativa TRADOC
Red Yo voy 8 de Marzo
Cuerpos Parlantes
Central Unitaria de Trabajadores de México (CUT)
Colectiva Vulvurina
Colectivo de Mujeres de Puerto Vallarta
Frente del Pueblo (FP)
Comité de Unidad Popular (CUP)
Consejo Popular Magonista (COPM)
Sendero socialista (SS)
Organización Nacional del Poder Popular (ONPP)
Organización Proletaria Emiliano Zapata (OPEZ Histórica)
Grupo Socialista Obrero (GSO)
Partido Revolucionario del Pueblo (PRP)
Frente Socialista (Fp, CUP, COPM, PRT, SS, OPT, ONPP, OPEZ Histórica, GSO y PRP)
Sindicato de Independiente de Trabajadoras y Trabajadores Académicos de la UNAM (SITTAUNAM)
Laboratorio de Ecología de Paisajes Fragmentados del IIES-UNAM
Colectivo Latinoamérica Socialista
Pro Fauna Silvestre Animalis
Individual signatories:
Julio Muñoz Rubio (Researcher CEIICH, UNAM)
Francisco De Parres Gómez (COTRIC, RUA
Carolina Elizabeth Díaz Iñigo (COTRIC y RUA)
Mayvelin Flores Villagómez
Argelia Guerrero Rentería
Claudio García Ehrenfeld
Carlos Corona Saldaña
Oscar Vélez Ruiz Gaitán (Revive México A.C.)
Juan Esteban Martínez Gómez
Mayvelin Flores Villagómez
Argelia Guerrero Rentería.
Carlos Corona Saldaña Raúl Romero
Alejandro Espinosa (INIFAP)
Diego Luz (assistant professor, Faculty of Economics UNAM)
Melissa Tzitziki
David Emigdio Andrade Hidalgo y Costilla
Sergio Prieto Díaz (ECOSUR Campeche)
José Martínez Cruz
Juliana G. Quintanilla
Marco Aurelio Palma Apodaca
Paloma Estrada Muñoz
Carlos Ezequiel Hernández
Lilia Flores
Héctor Sotomayor (DEPD/BUAP)
Carla Daniela Escobar Ortiz
Sarah Alejandra
Edgard Sánchez
Josefina Chávez
Apolline Anor
Martín de Jesús Cervantes López (student, IIES, UNAM)
María Fernanda Merlos Pérez (student, IIES, UNAM)
Emilio Arenas Guerrero (IIES-UNAM, Morelia)
Raúl Tauro (Red Mexicana de Bionergía)
David Alejandro Brindis Badillo (IIES, UNAM)
Amiel Aketzali Moreno
José Santos
Germán Hurtado
Alberto Bárcenas
Javier Contreras Villaseñor (teacher and choreographer)
Antonio Casas Castillo (teacher SEP Educación Indígena and university teacher)
Antonio González Rodríguez (Researcher IIES UNAM)
Gabriela Arroyo Robles (IIES)
Aftermath of a forest fire in Amazonas state, Brazil, on Aug. 24, 2019. (Bruno Kelly / Reuters)
Prenumerera på:
Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom)
"The curse of the crimson altar"
Denna skräckfilm fascinerar mig. Och triggar i vissa avsnitt fram - just skräck. Den måste väl ses som en b-film, många skulle nog säga c-...
-
.. om styckmordet är helt monolitisk. När det diskuterades tidigare fanns det alltid olika åsikter, nu kommer bara den ena sidan fram. De ...
-
/Publicerad i Spegeln 2/2000./ /Återpublicerat på förekommen anledning. Mitt inlägg kan te sig extremt, men det torde vara mycket svårt ...
-
Världen är, som bekant, ingen idyll. De mest otäcka saker förekommer, öppet såväl som dolt. Det är också sant att det finns en rad realistis...
4 kommentarer:
Läst det här ?
https://www.di.se/ledare/brasilien-har-ratt-att-bruka-sin-skog/
Nu har jag det. En mycket bagatelliserande debattartikel.
Alla borde faktiskt läsa DI, oavsett vad man tycker. I dagens ledare tycker de
t ex inte om den kommande bankskatten, men bejakar förstärkningen av försvaret ...
Att DI inte gillar bankskatter men ändå vill förstärka försvaret var ju mer än förutsägbart.
Skicka en kommentar